The Small Cap Value style ranks eighth out of the ten fund styles detailed in our 4Q25 Style Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. The category receives our Unattractive rating.
The Small Cap Growth style ranks last out of the ten fund styles detailed in our 4Q25 Style Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. The category receives our Very Unattractive rating.
The Small Cap Blend style ranks ninth out of the ten fund styles detailed in our 4Q25 Style Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. The category receives our Unattractive rating.
The Mid Cap Value style ranks fifth out of the ten fund styles detailed in our 4Q25 Style Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. The category receives our Neutral rating.
The Mid Cap Growth style ranks fourth out of the ten fund styles detailed in our 4Q25 Style Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. The category receives our Neutral rating.
The Mid Cap Blend style ranks seventh out of the ten fund styles detailed in our 4Q25 Style Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. The category receives our Neutral rating.
The Large Cap Value style ranks first out of the ten fund styles detailed in our 4Q25 Style Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. The category receives our Very Attractive rating.
The Large Cap Growth style ranks third out of the ten fund styles detailed in our 4Q25 Style Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. The category receives our Attractive rating.
The Large Cap Blend style ranks second out of the ten fund styles detailed in our 4Q25 Style Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. The category receives our Attractive rating.
The All Cap Blend style ranks sixth out of the ten fund styles detailed in our 4Q25 Style Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. The category receives our Neutral rating.