Our Focus List Stocks: Long Model Portfolio, the best of our Long Ideas, and our Focus List Stocks: Short Model Portfolio, the best of our Danger Zone picks, beat the Risk Free Rate (RFR) [1] as a long/short portfolio by 22% from the start of 2021 through the first nine months of 2025. See Figure 1. This outperformance underscores how important reliable fundamental research is.
Through the first nine months of 2025, however, the Model Portfolio underperformed as a long/short portfolio by 13.5%. See Figure 2.
Figure 1: Focus List Stocks: Long/Short Performance vs. RFR: 2021 Through First Nine Months of 2025
Sources: New Constructs, LLC
Note: Gain/Decline performance analysis excludes transaction costs, dividends and rebates. The Risk-Free Rate is based on the 3-month T-bill.
The long portfolio was up ~7% while the short portfolio was down 17% and underperformed as a short for a net return of -10.5% compared to the Risk-Free Rate at +3% in the first nine months of 2025. Note that short portfolios outperform when they fall more than the benchmark.
Figure 2: Focus List Stocks: Long/Short Performance vs. Risk-Free Rate: First Nine Months of 2025
Sources: New Constructs, LLC
Note: Gain/Decline performance analysis excludes transaction costs, dividends and rebates. The Risk-Free Rate is based on the 3-month T-bill.
Figure 3 provides more details on the Model Portfolios’ performance, which includes all stocks present in the Model Portfolios at any point in the first nine months of 2025.
Figure 3: First Nine Months of 2025 Long/Short Performance of Stocks in the Focus List Model Portfolios
Sources: New Constructs, LLC
Professional and Institutional members get real-time updates and can track all Model Portfolios on our site. The Focus List Stocks: Long Model Portfolio leverages superior fundamental data, which provides a novel alpha.
We’re here to help you navigate any market cycle. Our uniquely rigorous fundamental research consistently earns #1 rankings in several categories on SumZero.
Check Out the Indices Based on New Constructs Research
While we’re writing about how our Focus List Stocks Model Portfolios find winning stocks, we should highlight the indices we’ve developed with Bloomberg’s Index Licensing Group. All three outperformed the S&P 500 in 1H25. See Figures 4-6.
- Bloomberg New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders Index (ticker: BCORET:IND)
- Bloomberg New Constructs Ratings VA-1 Index (ticker: BNCVA1T:IND)
- Bloomberg New Constructs 500 Index (ticker: B500NCT:IND)
The Bloomberg New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders Index, which allocates based on Earnings Capture and Core Earnings, beat the S&P 500 by over 48% over the past five years. The Index (ticker: BCORET:IND) was up 142% while the S&P 500 was up 93%.
Figure 4: Bloomberg New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders Index Outperforms S&P 500: Last 5 Years
Sources: Bloomberg as of October 3, 2025
Note: Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
The “Very Attractive Stocks” Index, which allocates to stocks that get a Very Attractive rating by our AI Agent for Investing, beat the S&P 500 by 62% over the last five years. Bloomberg’s official name for the index is Bloomberg New Constructs Ratings VA-1Index (ticker: BNCVAT1T:IND). Figure 5 shows it was up 156% while the S&P 500 was up 93%.
Figure 5: Very Attractive-Rated Stocks Strongly Outperform the S&P 500: Last Five Years
Sources: Bloomberg as of October 3, 2025
Note: Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Our “Core-Earnings Weighted S&P 500” Index, which weights the largest 500 U.S. companies by Core Earnings instead of market cap, beat the S&P 500 by 31% over the past five years. Bloomberg’s official name for the index is Bloomberg New Constructs 500 Total Return Index (ticker: B500NCT:IND). Figure 6 shows it was up 124% while the S&P 500 was up 93%.
Figure 6: Bloomberg New Constructs 500 Index Strongly Outperforms the S&P 500: Last Five Years
Sources: Bloomberg as of October 3, 2025
Note: Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
This article was originally published on October 10, 2025.
Disclosure: David Trainer, Kyle Guske II, and Hakan Salt, receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, sector, style, or theme.
Questions on this report or others? Join our online community and connect with us directly.
[1] The Risk-Free Rate is based on the 3-month T-bill.