The Small Cap Blend style ranks eighth out of the twelve fund styles as detailed in our 3Q21 Style Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. It gets our Neutral rating.
The Small Cap Blend style ranks eleventh out of the twelve fund styles as detailed in our 2Q21 Style Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. It gets our Unattractive rating.
The Small Cap Blend style ranks tenth out of the twelve fund styles as detailed in our 4Q17 Style Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. It gets our Unattractive rating.
The Small Cap Blend style ranks ninth out of the twelve fund styles as detailed in our 3Q17 Style Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. It gets our Unattractive rating.
The Small Cap Blend style ranks ninth out of the twelve fund styles as detailed in our 2Q17 Style Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. It gets our Dangerous rating.
The Small Cap Blend style ranks eighth out of the twelve fund styles as detailed in our 1Q16 Style Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. It gets our Dangerous rating
All of the small cap styles earn our Dangerous rating, but Small Cap Blend Investors land in the Danger Zone due to the disproportionately large allocation to the worst funds in the style.
Check out my latest Danger Zone interview with Chuck Jaffe of MarketWatch.com.
iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index Fund (IJK) is in the Danger Zone this week.